![]() |
COVENANT Voice Published Quarterly by The Covenant People's Fellowship |
|
| COVENANT Voice the magazine of The Covenant People's Fellowship includes articles on a wide range of Bible teaching, prophecy, history, current events and other matters pertaining to the Christian faith. Published quarterly and mailed to subscribers throughout the United Kingdom and around the world it is available for a minimum annual subscription of £8.50 including postage. Overseas £10.50 or $17.00 (US dollars) |
||
| From the Winter 2001/2002 issue | |
![]() |
The Wise Men |
| Traditionally, Christians have come to think that there were three 'kings' who brought gifts to the Baby Jesus, after following a miraculous star which led them to where the young child lay. They brought gifts for the Holy Child of gold (to symbolise His Kingship), frankincense (to symbolise His Divinity) and myrrh (to symbolise His mortal manhood). The Bible does not in fact tell us how many men there were, nor that they were 'kings', neither does Scripture give us their names, although tradition names them as Melchior, Gaspar and Balthazar. The names of the wise men date from a tradition of the seventh century AD and legend has also invested them with the racial characteristics of the three main types of mankind. However, it is more likely that they came from Persia or Media and were therefore of the same type as those peoples. Tradition tells us that the Empress Helena, mother of Constantine, brought their bodies to Constantinople originally, whence they were taken to Milan and finally to Cologne, in 1162 by Frederick Barbarossa. They were, in fact, members of a priestly caste of Medes and Persians, adept at reading the signs in the heavens. The ancient Persian religion and, further back in time, that of the inhabitants of Iran and Iraq had included ziggurats where the astronomical experts ascended to scan the heavens and worship their gods. However, they seem to have also been aware of the prophecies concerning the Messiah in the Israelitish, and subsequently Jewish, religions, as demonstrated by their answer to Herod. They are also known as the 'Magi', from whence we obtain our translation of 'Wise Men'. In ancient times the magi were the experts in astrology and astronomy and their name, which is the plural form of 'magnus' , comes from the Persian 'magu', meaning magician. 'Magic' is from the same root. Incidentally, the Simon Magus mentioned in the New Testament was of this school, and he was converted to Christianity by Saint Philip. "But there was a certain man, called Simon, which beforetime in the same city used sorcery, and bewitched the people of Samaria, giving out that himself was some great one: To whom they all gave heed, from the least to the greatest saying, This man is the great power of God. And to him they had regard, because that of long time he had bewitched them with sorceries. But when they believed Philip preaching concerning the kingdom of God, and the name of Jesus Christ, they were baptised, both men and women. Then Simon himself believed also: and when he was baptised, he continued with Philip, and wondered beholding the miracles and signs which were done." (Acts 8: 9-13). The term simony, meaning to procure spiritual office by gifts, originates with this Simon. However, this is not to say that the Wise Men who brought gifts to Jesus were of this corrupt practise. They probably followed a very ancient tradition which appears to have been that of Melchizedek, who is mentioned in Genesis chapter 14. He was a High Priest and a foreshadower of the Aaronic priesthood, as we can see from verses 18-20. "And Melchizedek king of Salem brought forth bread and wine: and he was the priest of the most high God. And he blessed him, and said, Blessed be Abraham of the most high God, possessor of heaven and earth: And blessed be the most high God, which hath delivered thine enemies into thy hand. And he gave him tithes of all." We should note that he was the priest of the Most High God, so he held true to the ancient original monotheism before it was corrupted into polytheism and magic, and Abram visited him,; perhaps to learn from his wisdom. This true faith must have continued in Mesopotamia amongst some of the priests, and it must have been a continuation of this that the Wise Men practised. Their ancient British Equivalent were the Druids, who retained in their faith many of the Old Testament traditions and rituals A burial which was excavated at Stonehenge contained a bresatplate exactly like that described as being worn by the Aaronic priesthood of Israel. Both the Druids and the Wise Men were deep students of astronomy, and they would have been well versed in the "signs in the heavens" and cognisant of the fact that they were believed to foreshadow momentous events on earth; of which people and astronomers are today quite ignorant. Astrology, is the corrupt descendant of their art which has become the mere superstition about which Scripture warns us. "Thou art wearied in the multitude of thy counsels. Let now the astrologers, the stargazers, the monthly prognosticators, stand up, and save thee from these things that shall come upon thee. Behold, they shall be as stubble; the fire shall burn them; they shall not deliver themselves from the power of the flame: there shall not be a coal to warm at, nor fire to sit before." (Isaiah 47: 13-125) Some traditions would have Melchizedek to be the builder of the Great Pyramid of Egypt. Since the pyramids were in the tradition of the ziggurats it is possible that a follower of the ancient faith of Melchizedek built a pyramid, but it need not have been the Great Pyramid. King Herod as was to be expected, for such travellers would be noticeable, came to hear of the arrival of the Wise Men in his realm. He sent for them to ask them of their mission, and when they announced that they had come to seek the King of the Jews, Herod became alarmed as he feared a takeover of his throne. It was none too secure, so he was probably looking over his shoulder continually. He was not a true Jew, for he was an Idumean, which is a variation of the name of Edomite. His distant ancestor had been Esau, who had given away his Birthright for a meal, so Herod had no divine mandate to rule in Judaea. His authority came from the Roman conquerors. In 63 B.C. Pompey had appointed a priest named Hyrcanus to rule Galilee, Samaria, Judaea and Perea. He had a courtier named Antipater, also an Idumean, who was both ambitious and crafty. Antipater's two sons succeeded to his office. Phasael was murdered shortly after Julius Caesar was assassinated, and Herod escaped to Rome where he ingratiated himself with Octavian (later Augustus Caesar). He administered Judaea, under the aegis of the Roman Emperors, from 40 to 4 BC. The Jews were not happy with his rule, for he secured his power by a strong military regime and built menacing strongholds, of which Masada was one. There had been murder committed within his own family, and it may truly be said of him, "Uneasy lies the head which wears a crown". It is not surprising, therefore, that he was alarmed at the Wise Men's claim that they had come to seek the King of the Jews. From the fact that the Wise Men encountered Herod, it must be inferred that Jesus' birth was in or about 4 BC, or perhaps a little earlier, and recent studies of ancient astral movements and phenomena recorded in former times would also seem to suggest a time nearer this date. When Bishop Ussher surmised the Biblical dates which are in our copies of the Bible, he did not have access to the knowledge available today. Since the Wise Men were astronomers they were intrigued by an unusual and bright star which arose in the heavens, and they searched their books of wisdom to discover its significance. They must have had access to the Scriptures and Messianic prophecies, for they worked out this portent foreshadowed the coming of a King of the Jews. It may have been a sudden bright light in the sky, such as a shooting star, a comet or a nova, but this is not particularly likely, for the Romans did not record it. The idea that this was a new and unique star is not a modern one, for in AD 200 an early Christian who lived in Alexandria, named Origen, expressed the opinion that the star of Bethlehem was a new star, one which would have been previously unknown to the most learned stargazer. There is a wealth of historical and archaeological information about astronomical phenomena of ancient times. Experts have access to Greek, Romans and Babylonian records and those of the Egyptians and the Chinese. They are also beginning to understand the Mayan and Aztec observations of central and South America. We now know that when Julius Caesar was assassinated in 44 BC a comet was sighted, and another in AD 66, shortly before Nero committed suicide. Hayley's Comet is mentioned in great detail in Chinese records, and it was seen in 1066 (and embroidered into the Bayeux tapestry). Then in our day, it was again visible in 1986. However, there is no mention in the Roman records of a comet or similar star appearing around 4 BC. This could have been because it was not visible in the Mediterranean countries, although it would surely have been seem in the Eastern Mediterranean if it was followed from the east to Bethlehem. Other theories have postulated that the star was a conjunction of two planets, Saturn and Jupiter, for there was a rabbinical tradition that the Messiah would come when there was a conjunction of Saturn and Jupiter in Pisces. The astronomer Kepler calculated that there would have been such a conjunction in 6 BC. In 1925 the German scholar, P Schnabel, deciphered some cuneiform scripts of the ancient School of Astrology from Sippur, in Babylonia. The position of the planets were carefully marked and it showed a conjunction of Jupiter and Saturn in Pisces in 7 BC. The records indicated that the planets were visible for five months, and this could have been the time in which the Wise Men marked and followed the lead of the planets, until they arrived in Palestine. This conjunction would have been visible in the Mediterranean. It is possible that the Romans did not record it because it was not as spectacular as a comet and they would not, of course, have realised its significance to the Jews of the day. The Wise Men would have carefully observed the rising and setting of this 'twin star', which would have appeared as one planet as viewed from earth. Since the time of Judah's captivity many Jews had lived in Babylon, which was taken over by the Medes and the Persians. They did not all return to rebuild Jerusalem with Ezra and Nehemiah. Many remained and some may have studied at this very school of Astronomy. They would have been aware of their people's traditions and Scriptures and, in this way, the Wise Men may have come to their conclusions. It is even possible that they were of Judah ancestry. As October 23rd was the Jewish day of Atonement, it may have been around this date that they either began their journey or completed it, on their arrival in Jerusalem It is significant that Jesus was born to be an atonement for the sins of the whole of mankind. We now come to a difficulty, for Luke tells us that at the time of Jesus' birth, the shepherds were abiding in the field. In the month of December, in Palestine, there is frost in the hill regions. Both Jerusalem and Bethlehem are situated on higher ground and the flocks would therefore have been brought into shelter in November, not being put out again until March. Jesus' birth must, therefore, have been before winter set in. Another difficulty is that Joseph and Mary had travelled to Bethlehem for the census. Critics have said that a full census was carried out in AD 6/7. However, there were probably local counts of the population both before and after this. About the year 6 BC the Pharisees and Herod had a great dispute, for Herod considered himself to be a Messiah - how typical of dictators! The Pharisees predicted Herod's death as a punishment, so Herod had their leaders executed. This would have been about the same time as the conjunction of the planets. It is true, of course, that he died shortly afterwards; but at the age of seventy. Herod was so alarmed at the revelations of the Wise Men that he commanded all the male infants under one year old should be murdered. But the Wise Men were in touch with the Lord, and were warned in a dream not to disclose the Babe's whereabouts to Herod when they found Him. So, as Scripture tells us, "they departed another way", and left Herod's realm stealthily to return to their own country. Herod did not let the matter rest, but diligently sought the Holy Child. However, once again in a dream, God warned Joseph and Mary to flee from Bethlehem and travel down into Egypt. No doubt the expensive gifts were a useful means of meeting the expenses of their flight and their temporary sojourn in a foreign land. Perhaps warnings from the Wise men also confirmed their decision. The Wise Men must have felt themselves privileged indeed to have been among the first to see the young child Jesus, and to worship Him. Their lives would most likely have been very different after such an experience, just as our lives today are different when we have seen Jesus and believed in Him and in His mission of salvation for the individual, and redemption for Israel. |
|
| From the Summer/Autumn 2001 issue | |
![]() |
Numbering the People |
| NOTWITHSTANDING the optimistic "count me in" slogan at the head of the Census 2001 Forms delivered in good time, or not, dependant on the efficiency of a somewhat misnamed 'enumerator' some two million households, it was reported at the last count, decided that they would prefer that the Census takers should "include them out!" Such was the confusion in which the first census of the millennium was both promoted and conducted, both with regards to a number of the questions and the criteria upon which the answers were to be completed, that thousands in frustration telephoned the help lines, which Mr. Graham Jones, the director of the census, interpreted as people keen to "get it right". Others, as we now know, just gave up and did nothing. Despite the exhortation on the leaflet accompanying the census form, that you should put yourself in the picture because "This is your Census" it was clearly, nothing of the kind. Added to which the instruction that one should "Simply" fill in the form was a clear indication that at no time during the preparation of the questions had anyone actually asked themselves, or anyone else, just how they were to be answered. Aside from the well publicised questions about race and religion, which caused some furore in the press, in which one can be born in England, Wales or Scotland but not actually be English, Welsh or Scots (Questions 7 and 8), there were other ambiguities. For we find question 17 in asking "Do you have any of the 'following' professional qualifications?" in which it lists only teaching and medical qualifications everything else being 'other', then offers a box in which to answer by ticking 'no professional qualifications' Then for good measure there are questions 25 and 26 in which the self employed 'without any' employees are then asked to indicate how many people they 'employed'. Having also claimed that the census is all about planning for the future, there was also at least one pointless question in which pensioners, up to the age of seventy five, were asked what their occupation had been before they retired. The answer to that question will clearly be of paramount importance in planning for new businesses! It has been reported that whilst Lady Thatcher, as Prime Minister, insisted on checking for herself the questions being proposed in the previous census, our present Prime Minister left it all to the officials of the Statistical Office. Although in some respects that might have been a good thing, it certainly shows, and the cost of this debacle at some two hundred and fifty million pounds makes it the most expensive census undertaken since the present regular ten years censuses began in 1801. With the exception, that is, of 1941 when the country was otherwise engaged with fighting a war for our freedom (including our freedom not to answer silly questions!), a little matter which the writers of the bump handed out forgot! Further confusion was ensured with regards to the date of completion of the Form when it was revealed that not only could it be completed after the date but that the telephone help line would remain open throughout the following month of May, indicating that Census Day was not to be so regarded after all. Consequently encouraging not only late completion but early completion as well, which was compounded by the New Labour innovation that forms were to be returned by post rather than being collected and checked on the doorstep by the enumerators. Thus the enumerators became mere deliverers of census forms whereas previously, as the writer knows from first hand experience of the census carried out thirty years ago, it was their function to ensure not only that all forms were collected but also, so far as possible, that all the questions were answered, even if there might be some slight doubt of their absolute accuracy in those days, with regards to personal relationships. It is currently estimated, with local managers struggling to gather their share of the twenty million forms, that less than three quarters will ever be collected. Of those as few as half it is said, in some areas, may contain the detailed information that it was hoped to collect. With such huge gaps this means that the so called 'count me in' operation is likely to collect full details of only fifty per cent of the population, making it the biggest failure since census gathering, as we know it, commenced two centuries ago, when just five questions were asked of the then ten million people, for which those of us who have undertaken family tree research are truly grateful! This year's form of forty questions would be something of a nightmare to research. There is of course nothing new in census taking, despite the recent farcical episode which might make some think so, and we in England would probably look to William the Conqueror's efforts in 1086 with the production of the Doomsday Book as being our first census in which, amongst other assets, ownership of cattle and sheep were included much as motor vehicles are today. While our brethren in Scotland would no doubt claim to be the first in the Isles with the seventh century Gaelic document, Senchus fer n'Alba. The average Christian, in looking for an early census, will of course, recall the journey of Joseph and Mary to Bethlehem, "because he was of the house and lineage of David", when the decree was sent out from Caesar Augustus, "that all the world (as he knew it) be taxed" and each went to his own city to be enrolled. (Luke 2: 1-7). It was whilst there as we know that Jesus was born, and the prophecy of Micah 5:2 was fulfilled, "But thou Bethlehem Ephratah, though thou be little among the thousands of Judah, yet out of thee shall come forth unto me that is to be ruler in Israel .…" Acts 5:37 indicates that this was a census in preparation for taxation a later date. Some view census taking with some misgiving having in mind the time when King David, against the advice of Joel, insisted that, "all who drew the sword" in Israel and Judah be numbered. (2 Samuel 24:1) The exercise took nine months and twenty days to complete and the count revealed that there were eight hundred thousand men in the armies of Israel and five hundred thousand in Judah. When God later took David to task over his vanity in doing this, for there was no reason to count the armies at that time, David placed himself in to the hands of the Lord and He caused a pestilence which carried away seventy thousand of his men. On other occasions however the numbering of the people was to the glory of God. As in the reduction of Gideon's army, recorded in Judges 7:6, when the Lord distinguished between those who went down on their hands and knees to drink from the stream and those who were ever ready by placing their hands only in the water and lapping from them, to reduce the army to only three hundred men, who then went out in the power of the Lord to fight the Midianites so saving Israel from her enemies as God had promised Gideon. . Earlier in the history of Israel, when the family of Israel was developing into the nation which was to become a kingdom, Moses and Aaron had been instructed by God when they were in the Sinai wilderness to number all those from twenty years and upwards "who drew the sword" in each of the tribes with the exception of the Levites (Numbers 1:3). There follows a quite detailed census which resulted in a total of six hundred and three thousand five hundred and fifty men in all twelve tribes, and an even more detailed census of the families of the Levites. These numbered some twenty two thousand which were offset against the first born of the households of the other tribes and taken in substitution of the first born of each household of Israel which God instituted in Egypt. This is further followed, in Numbers 4: 23-49, by a details of the offices and functions within the priesthood and administration which the Levites performed. Then when the Israelites, under Moses, had come within sight of the land of Canaan the Lord separated all those who were twenty years and upwards who had seen God's hand when He had brought them out of Egypt and did not listen to His voice, "all that were numbered of you …. according to your whole number" (Numbers 14: 29) except Caleb and Joshua from the "little ones" that they should not enter the land of promise. Being destined, because of their murmuring against God to wander for forty years while their children grew to maturity and subsequently occupy the land which their parents had despised. While on the way the Israelites came into the land of Moab and it was here that Balak, the king's son, sent for Balaam to curse them but God met Balaam and he prophesied instead, "For from the top of the rocks I see him, and from the fields I behold him: lo, the people shall dwell alone, and shall not be reckoned among the nations, who can count the dust of Jacob and number of the fourth part of Israel?" So taking us back to that great Covenant when, following the sacrifice of the ram substituted by God in place of Isaac on the mountain in the land of Moriah, the Lord promised Abraham, "….. I will bless thee, and in multiplying I will multiply thy seed as the stars of heaven, and as the sand which is upon the sea shore ….." (Genesis 22: 1-17). A Covenant which the Lord re-affirmed to Isaac himself, "because that Abraham obeyed my voice" (Genesis 26: 4-5) and later to Jacob and subsequently to Moses when he was on Mount Sinai (Exodus 32:13) receiving the law and commandments by which the Nation and Kingdom of Israel was to live and prosper. |
|
| From the Spring 2001 issue | |
![]() Photograph Copyright Powerstock Zefa Limited |
A Very Grievous Murrain |
| AT PRESENT our thoughts are focused on the outbreak of foot and mouth disease, which is having a devastating effect on our farmers, their families and the countryside in general. This is a cruel blow, coming shortly after an outbreak of swine fever, and the previous problems from BSE. Added to these troubles are the difficulties which EC legislation is causing the hard pressed farmers, some of whom have become so desperate that they have committed suicide. I have even read in a newspaper an article wondering whether this is a judgement upon us! However, the author's conclusions were not what a Christian would conclude. At least, it is a step in the right direction, that someone even begins to talk about judgement. Agriculture is the lifeblood of any nation. Without our farmers growing food for us, we will not eat. In this modern world, the effect is not quite so immediately noticeable as it would have been in a less mechanised era, but the present situation will force us to import more of our food from abroad, with all the attendant problems, both logistically and economically. Moses was aware of the dangers of the wrong treatment of the soil, which in ancient and modern times has resulted in 'dust bowls', causing formerly fertile areas to become deserts. God laid down the Laws for the proper maintenance of the land by crop rotation, and warned that abuse of the soil results in starvation. You may read about this in Leviticus 26 and Deuteronomy 28. For several generations now, we have farmed the land intensively, relying upon chemicals to boost the yields, and not replenishing the soil's goodness naturally. We have moved further and further away from God's instructions for agriculture, and for all other aspects of life. God told us that the land should be rested once every seven years, and that there should be a complete cessation from tilling the ground every fiftieth year. The Lord assured us that the previous year's yield would be sufficient to see us through the Sabbath year. "And the Lord spake unto Moses in mount Sinai, saying, Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them, When ye come into the land which I give you, then shall the land keep a sabbath unto the Lord. Six years thou shalt sow thy field, and six years thou shalt prune thy vineyard, and gather in the fruit thereof; But in the seventh year shall be a sabbath of rest unto the land, a sabbath for the Lord: thou shalt neither sow thy field, nor prune thy vineyard. That which groweth of its own accord of thy harvest thou shalt not reap, neither gather the grapes of thy vine undressed: for it is a year of rest unto the land. And the sabbath of the land shall be meat for you; for thee, and for thy servant, and for thy maid, and for thy hired servant, and for thy stranger that sojourneth with thee. And for thy cattle, and for the beast that are in thy land, shall all the increase thereof be meat. And thou shalt number seven sabbaths of years unto thee, seven times seven years; and the space of the seven sabbaths of years shall be unto thee forty and nine years. Then shalt thou cause the trumpet of the jubilee to sound on the tenth day of the seventh month, in the day of atonement shall ye make the trumpet sound throughout all your land. And ye shall hallow the fiftieth year, and proclaim liberty throughout all the land unto all the inhabitants thereof: it shall be a jubilee unto you." (Leviticus 25:1-10) We are warned in Scripture that abuse of the land results in desolation, and our ultimate starvation. We have ignored the Sabbaths, in order to squeeze as much produce from the soil as we possibly can. The inevitable result is impoverishment of the soil and the subsequent use of chemical fertilisers. If we should treat the land properly, as the Lord has instructed, we would have a constant abundance. There is no evil in over production, in fact, it can benefit the soil by using the surplus to make an enriching compost to nourish future crops. Mankind has become rather too clever for his own good. There is hardly a food on the market which has not been processed or chemically adulterated in some way. Without the chemical fertilisers the yield is not so great, but the quality is so much better. During recent years, organic farming has become more popular than hitherto, and therefore more viable. It was a struggle for those trying to market it to start with, because there was little demand for the products, but people have gradually come to realise how much better such food tastes, and despite the vested objections of some, many more are now amenable to it. Our food is only obtained by tilling the soil and rearing animals, so it follows that agriculture plays a key role in maintaining and promoting health. Organic food may yield a little less, but with such a marked improvement in quality. Conventional modern farming sacrifices quality for quantity. The farmer has the greatest responsibility of any producer in civilisation, but through the misuse by some of this responsibility, and the demands of the declared economic wisdom of the day together with the coercion of governments during more recent decades, many are now suffering. Ultimately, all the people will suffer, the innocent with the guilty, for we are all part of the one system. There are quite a few enlightened people, notably the Prince of Wales amongst them, who are convinced that the key to successful farming and better general health is to return to God's methods, as set forth in the Bible. This does not mean that we should abandon all our agricultural machinery, which has done so much to alleviate the back breaking work of tilling the soil, sowing and reaping, for these are a necessary adjunct to ease the work of those who toil on the land all day, especially in these times of fewer farm workers. We should, however, respect the natural cycles, for there are many of them - the cycle of the seasons and the 'nitrogen cycle', for instance, by which the soil is replenished. If we read Genesis 3:19, we can see that plants, animals and mankind were formed from the dust of the earth, "In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return." Also in Ecclesiastes 12:7, we read, "Then shall the dust return to the earth as it was: and the spirit shall return unto God who gave it." This is referring to what we now call humus. God's Plan has made the provision that all living things should contribute to this after death. We now know that even humans are composed of comparatively few elements, literally, 'of the dust of the ground'. It is understandable why the farmers have had to turn to chemicals to boost their crop yields, for the downside of the mechanisation of farming has been the depletion of the supplies of manure for fertilising the soil, and the upsurge of population has created a greater demand, whilst that same population increase has resulted in ever larger areas of arable land being used for housing. We have drifted so far from God's way that we have had to muddle along in our own ways, and we are now seeing the results. Some may say that animal and plant diseases are not new, but have been with us since the dawn of time. This is not strictly true, for the Lord created everything perfect, and He 'saw that it was good'; it is mankind's disobedience which has allowed the weeds and diseases to develop and spread. We cannot plead ignorance, for it is all written down in God's Guide Book, the Bible. Our experts ignore this, for they think that they know better. Animals have routinely been fed antibiotics, for their health is not as good as it should have been if they had lived in natural conditions. We are now reaping the rewards, in that germs have built up a resistance to antibiotics to such an extent that doctors are now finding that they are no longer effective. There is much concern about drug resistant bacteria nowadays. Another aspect which has not been fully explored, is that of the interaction of the different chemicals, one with another. We are so puffed up in our own conceit that we will not even listen when some people try to point out that there is an alternative to all the chemicals currently in use. In the present outbreak of disease, a reader wrote to the "Daily Telegraph", citing the fact that in the previous outbreak, some thirty or so years ago, many farmers saved their stock by giving them homeopathic borax. The writer contacted the Ministry of Agriculture to alert them to this fact, thinking that the officials would be glad to try an alternative, or even to grasp at a lifeline. However, the response was that the Ministry wanted nothing to do with this method of treatment, because they 'did not believe in it'! Such prejudice is certainly no help to farmers who are facing ruin. Who would, surely, be willing to try anything to preserve their stocks. Movement of stock has been restricted, due to the outbreak of disease. It has been reported that it would not be quite so much of a problem if we had not had to close numerous small local abattoirs, because of EU legislation, which has resulted in animals from Sussex, for instance, being transported many miles away, often to the north of the country. Subjecting them, inevitably, to unnecessary stress and adding to costs. Under this European system, it appears that everything is directed towards ruining our farming and supporting industries. This 'doomsday scenario' is becoming alarming. We will have to face up to hardships sooner or later, for only in this way shall we begin to understand what we have done to ruin the natural balance of nature. The present outbreak of foot and mouth disease may be the beginning of a process to help bring us to our senses, and perhaps, we would like to hope, make us seek our Lord God for help and guidance in our lives, both personal and national. For Scripture tells us, "When thou art in tribulation, and all these things are come upon thee, even in the latter days, if thou turn to the Lord thy God, and shalt be obedient unto his voice; (For the Lord thy God is a merciful God;) he will not forsake thee, neither destroy thee, nor forget the covenant of thy fathers which he sware unto them." (Deuteronomy 4:30,31) Let all true believers pray earnestly to the Lord, that He will send His Holy Spirit to guide our experts and our rulers. Let us pray that He may raise up men to be our leaders, both spiritual and temporal, who are of sufficient calibre and who are unmotivated by the greed for money and power, that we may be led back to the righteous and health-giving Laws of the Lord. |
|
From the Summer 2000 Issue
Her
Majesty Queen Elizabeth
The
Queen Mother
IN
THIS, the first year of our new century, the “nation’s favourite
Grandmother”, the Queen Mother, also attains her century. This should be an
occasion of national rejoicing, for she is the first member of the royal family
to attain this venerable age.
It seems, however, that our present
government and leftist BBC wish to play down such royalist rejoicings, but even
amongst our young people, tainted as they have been by the republican bias of
their education, there are many who are very fond of her, and who admire her
tenacity and devotion to duty. We, who are starved of colourful ceremony in
these days, will surely enjoy the festivities which are planned.
| The Lady Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon was born on August
4th 1900. She was the youngest of four daughters of the 14th Earl of
Strathmore and Kinghorn, and his wife, Nina Cecilia Cavendish-Bentinck.
The family seat was at Glamis Castle, the scene of Shakespeare’s tragedy
of “Macbeth”, and she had
a happy childhood amongst her brothers and sisters in the rural settings
of the family estates. This gave her an enduring love of the countryside
and its pursuits. One of her brothers was killed in the first World War,
and Glamis was turned into a convalescent home for wounded military
personnel. The young Lady Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon helped with the nursing
duties.
In 1923 she married the Duke of York, the second son of George
V, who subsequently became King George VI, on the abdication of his
brother, Edward VIII. During the years of the second World War, as Queen
Consort, she was an inspiration to the beleaguered people of the British
Isles. Setting an example of steadfastness, in that she refused to allow
the princesses, Elizabeth and Margaret Rose, to be evacuated to safety and
plenty in Canada, insisting that as the King would never leave England,
she too would never leave the King, and that they wished to have their
family with them.
|
![]() Photograph Ó Copyright “The News, Portsmouth” |
|
The two princesses lived at Windsor Castle during the
war, and the King and Queen continually did their best to boost the morale
of the Londoners who were enduring the Blitz. Queen Elizabeth is said to
have remarked, when Buckingham Palace was bombed, that she was glad to
have this affinity with the
people of the shattered
capital. Her charm and sympathy lifted the spirits of the battered people. When
her daughter was crowned Queen, and Elizabeth became the Queen Mother, she
was at first devastated by her early widowhood, but realised her duty to
support the new young Queen Elizabeth II, and has fulfilled this role ever
since, even to a great age, for she still fulfils not a few public
engagements, in spite of two hip replacements. A lady of dignity and
courage, she is an example to all. It is not generally realised that the
Queen Mother’s lineage can be traced back as far as that of her
daughter, the Queen, or that King George VI and Queen Elizabeth had a
common ancestor in Brian Boru, who
was King of Ireland from 1002 to 1014. King George VI’s descent from
Brian Boru was through his grand-daughter, Dearbforgail, who died in 1080.
She was married to Dermot MacMailnamo, King of Leinster and Ireland, who
died in 1072. The Queen Mother’s line from Brian Boru was through
Brian’s son, Teige or Terence, who died in 1023. Brian Boru’s ancestry goes back
into the mists of the distant past, in the BC. era. He was descended from
the ancient kings of Ulster and the present day O’Neills are a branch of
this ancient family, taking their name from the legendary Niall of the
Nine Hostages. He was not the original Niall, for Irish traditions tell of
a Milesian prince, called Nelius, who became Niul in the Irish records. He
married one of Zedekiah’s daughters, Scota, when the princesses Tamar
and Scota were in exile in Egypt under the protection of the Pharaoh. Some of the Irish legends say that
Niul was a Scythian, but since the Scythians came later, after the
deportation of the Ten Tribes to Assyria, it would seem that the
traditions have their chronology somewhat muddled. It is feasible that he
was a Milesian, or an escaped Trojan from the destruction of Troy. What is
more certain is that he was of the same race as Scota, being of the
nations of Israelites who had
left Egypt to go adventuring before the time of the Exodus, and who had
settled in Greece and, that which is today, Turkey. The legends tell that Jeremiah left
Egypt with the Princess Tamar Tephi, taking with him the Stone of Destiny,
which was known as Jacob’s Pillar, and which had been used for the
coronations of the kings of the line of David. Tamar was the elder
daughter and as her sister was married she
seemed to be settled in Egypt. Tamar was the heiress of the line of
David, which was overturned to
the shores of Hibernia, or
Ireland. The stories go that a certain holy prophet landed upon
Hibernia’s shores, accompanied by his scribe, Brug, and a beautiful
young princess, together with a large stone. The reigning Heremon of the
area, (Heremon means “a crowned horseman”), was named Eochaidh.
He fell in love with the princess and married her, and their descendants
may be traced through the Irish records. Tamar was buried in the Hill of
Tara, and the ensuing kings of Ulster were crowned on the Stone of Destiny
for 800 years. It still survives as the Stone of Scone, which lay under
the Coronation Chair in Westminster Abbey until its recent removal to
Edinburgh Castle. The traditions trace Jeremiah and the
princess, with Brug (Baruch) through Spain. Baruch is mentioned in
Jeremiah 32:12. He is said to have been Jeremiah’s secretary. The ships of Tarshish were the
paramount sailors and traders of those days, and there was a thriving
trade with Spain, the western coast of France, the British Isles, and even
extending to the Scandinavian countries, perhaps for the carriage of amber
to the Mediterranean countries. It may be that Jeremiah intended to go to
Denmark, but the party was shipwrecked off the coast of Ulster.
Eochaidh the Heremon was a member of the Darnaians, or Tuatha de
Danaan. It has also been said that the early settlers in Ireland were
related to the Carthaginians, who were Israelitish Phoenicians. |
|
The ancient rulers of these people were descended from Zarah,
a son of the patriarch Judah, by Tamar, his daughter-in-law. Zarah was a
twin of Pharez, from whom the kings of Israel were descended. Zarah,
however, appears to have left his brethren and to go adventuring, perhaps
with the Phoenicians, who had a large admixture of
the descendants of Jacob amongst them. A famous port in Spain was
called Zara-gossa, (modern Saragossa), which was one of the colonies of
the Hebrews and Phoenicians. Thus, by his marriage to the princess Tamar,
Eochaidh united the Zarah and Pharez lines. The people who had
settled in Ireland were known as the Darnii, mentioned on Ptolemy’s
famous map. Their territory was the present counties of Londonderry and
Antrim. The Milesians arrived in Ireland
around 1,000 BC. The Darnii came later, arriving between 800 to 600 BC.
Whether the princess Scota came to live in Ireland to be near her sister,
we are not told, but there is a certain amount of confusion between the
two princesses, and it is reasonable that she did so. Her husband’s
people most certainly settled there.
Dardanus was the mythical ancestor of the Trojans, and his name has
been linked with Troy, Phrygia and Etruria, all colonies of Israelites. It is significant that the emblem of
Northern Ireland, or Ulster is the Red Hand, which was the badge of Zarah.
If we look at the Biblical story of the birth of Pharez and Zarah, we
shall see how significant this is. “And it came to pass in the time of
her travail, that, behold, twins were in her womb. And it came to pass,
when she travailed, that the one put out his hand: and the midwife took
and bound upon his hand a scarlet thread, saying, This came out first. And
it came to pass, as he drew back his hand, that, behold, his brother came
out: and she said, How hast thou broken forth? this breach be upon thee:
therefore his name was called Pharez. And
afterward came out his brother, that had the scarlet thread upon his hand:
and his name was called Zarah.” (Genesis 38:27-30) The six main lines of the O’Neills
have the Red Hand in their coat of arms. The Welsh princes are also said to
have been descended from Trojan settlers, and Queen Elizabeth II inherited
their line through the Tudors. In this way, Queen Elizabeth II
unites many strands of the Israelitish princes and the Royal House of
David, just as her ancestress, Tamar Tephi, united the two lines from
Judah, of Pharez and Zarah. It is surely the overruling
of God which is responsible for bringing all these strands
together. We should understand our rich
heritage of history and our destiny as the Servant Race, but Satan is
doing his best to destroy this knowledge and the Royal House. We know that
he will not succeed, for the Lord said to David: “For thus saith the Lord; David
shall never want a man to sit upon the throne of the house of Israel.”
(Jeremiah 33:17) “And thine house and thy kingdom
shall be established for ever before thee: thy throne shall be established
for ever.” (Jeremiah 33:20-21) “Thus saith the Lord; If ye can
break my covenant of the day, and my covenant of the night, and that there
should not be day and night in their season; Then may also my covenant be
broken with David my servant, that he should not have a son to reign upon
his throne; And thine house and thy kingdom shall be established for ever
before thee: thy throne shall be established for ever.” (II Samuel 7:16) There are numerous other verses in
the Bible which reiterate these promises to David, many more than the two
witnesses required by Scripture. In this way we may see how important it
is that the throne of David should be preserved,. It is as unconditional
as the Birthright Covenants, and exceptionally holy, for it had to be
preserved for Our Lord to take over at His Second Coming. Black as the picture may seem at
present, and menacing as are the redoubled efforts of the republicans and
anti-royalists, God has assured us that His Throne will endure for ever,
and we value our present Royal House and their dedicated service to their
people, personified by our beloved Queen Mother and her daughter, Queen
Elizabeth II., “until he
come whose right it is”; (Ezekiel
21:27)
|
From the Winter 1999 - 2000 issue
The Millennium Dawn
THERE HAS BEEN some concern expressed, as we come to
end of the year and indeed this century that the Millennium Dome, currently
under construction at Greenwich, will not be completed in time for the much
heralded ‘Millennium Celebrations’.
Which is a curious thing, because as most of us know, the true Millennium will not commence for another year; as, in fact, we
pass from the 31st December 2000 to the 1st January 2001.
This
simple fact notwithstanding, much of the world is determined to regard the 1st
January 2000 A.D. as the commencement of the next Millennium, so we cannot in
all conscience totally ignore the
change of year whilst perhaps feeling, as with the question of the
coming of age when many families now celebrate both the eighteenth and
the twenty-first birthday, that we shall most probably find ourselves similarly
celebrating both dates; although many currently do not seem too certain exactly
what it is they are meant to be celebrating. Certainly it has little to do with
the birth of Jesus Himself for if the generally accepted date of 4 BC is
correct, (some suggest other dates all of which are BC) the second millennium
from that date was in 1996, or even before!
It
may well be that much of the present confusion, aside from having its origins in
the original dating errors, owes
much to that other misnomer the, so called, Millennium
Bug which again has nothing to do with
the true Millennium and even less to
do with bugs, as we know them! Being merely a problem of computer memory capacity, or lack of it, in which the
earliest programmes, presumed to be destined to be totally obsolete long before
the year 2000 which in fact could never happen unless every original system was
scrapped, expressed built-in dates in terms of the last two digits only.
So
it seems that despite our better judgement, the ‘Millennium’
or perhaps we ought to say the ‘Pre-Millennium’
is almost upon us.
Whilst
countries with calendars other than ours, the
Gregorian calendar, may
not celebrate the Millennium including the true one when it comes all nations, because
of the International Meridian
Conference held in Washington in 1884, allow that Greenwich is both
the centre of time and space and the home of the Meridian Line, Zero
Longitude, upon which all navigational
aids depend and where time, as we know it, commences.
It
was the matter of accurate navigation for shipping, in particular, which
prompted the United States to suggest a conference to establish the principles,
amongst others, to adopt a single world meridian based upon the meridian passing
through the Royal Observatory at Greenwich, to agree that the universal day be a
Mean Solar Day beginning at the Mean Midnight at Greenwich and to accept that
nautical and astronomical days world wide would begin at Mean Midnight.
One
of the key reasons for the choice of Greenwich, at the time, was that three
quarters of the world’s commerce already depended on sea charts which used
Greenwich as the Prime Meridian which, as a matter of interest today, runs just
alongside the site of the Millennium Dome.
Greenwich
itself has a long and, one must say, distinguished history. Today, thousands
visit each year to see the splendid collection of charts, clocks, chronometers
and other inventions without which we, and most of the world, should still be
navigating the seas and getting lost; and to stand astride the Meridian Line
with one foot in the Eastern Hemisphere and
the other in the Western. Not, perhaps, a very significant step for mankind but
nonetheless something unique.
One
interesting aspect of all this is that because each day begins at midnight the
first people to actually experience the dawn
of the first day will be those living on the other side of the world, which has
generated considerable rivalry, with an eye to a commercial advantage, to be the
first to see the first dawn of the New
Year.
The
International Date Line at 180 degrees Longitude, which was also agreed at the
1884 Conference, being the other side of the Greenwich Meridian Line has caused
some heated competition as Pacific islands bordering the line which was
originally agreed not to pass over any landfall, is, it seems, being ‘claimed’ by some such as Caroline Island, in the Republic of
Kiribati where the sun will rise at 5.43 am on the 1st January 2000
(but it will be 3.43 pm GMT on the 31st December 1999). Other
claimants include Tonga, Pitt Island and the New Zealand’s North Island
coastal towns of Gisborne and Hastings while the United States claim the last
sunset and the first sunrise between Dibble Glacier and Victor bay in
Antarctica.
However,
astronomers at the Royal Observatory tell us that the place to see the first
dawn will not be in the Pacific but on Katchall island on the eastern edge of
the Bay of Bengal, 6000 miles west of the International Date Line. This
calculation being based on the Mean Solar Day, which as was agreed in 1884
begins at Midnight at Greenwich, it will at that moment be 5.30 am on the 1st
January 2000, on Katchall Island; the time the sun rises there.
Such
is man’s ability to confuse the issue to the extent that we no longer know
what date we are talking about, nor why we are celebrating
it anyway, that it rather
overshadows all the forecasts, dire and otherwise, of the events
which the pundits promise us will take place immediately the Millennium begins.
We need in all truth to ask only one question, “What millennium?”
In
the event, of course, despite all expectations the New Century will dawn and the
only certainty is that we know that God will be waiting there for us, as He
always is; every dawn. He has already prepared a new day and a new century for
us and we shall be that much nearer to that other Millennium for which we long
and pray. ‘The Millennium’
which really counts. The day when our Lord and Saviour, Jesus Christ will
return; and here we do see a similarity in that where the day will soon come
when the year 2000 AD begins so too, although we have been waiting for it for
most of those two thousand years, the day will also come when, “every eye
shall see him” (Revelation 1:7) as He comes with clouds and His angels on His
return to this earth, to begin the restitution of all things.
This
Millennium, a word which does not in
fact appear in Scripture, is the one thousand year period during which Christ
will reign and Satan will be bound and helpless (Revelation 20: 1-3). which will
bring nearer to fruition God’s plan for His people Israel.
Without
Satan’s influence it will be a millennium of peace. Something which we, with
our experience of life today and knowing that of our forefathers’ experiences
during centuries past, find difficult
to comprehend. Until, that is, we consider the causes of greed, envy and evil
which lay behind the problems which continually beset us. Without Satan’s
influence, even amongst our own people, how our thoughts would change and
consequently our actions.
God,
when He caused the flood in Noah’s time did so because, “every imagination
of their thoughts were evil continually,” (Genesis 6:5). The people of his day
had begun some 1600 years previously well enough, they had known God and obeyed
His law. But generation by generation they began to think that the law did not
matter; and once they thought it, they acted upon that thought, until by the
time of the flood Noah was the only righteous man left. What they thought, they
did!
Were
we able to have just one generation without Satan’s influence our own and our
children’s thinking would change beyond all recognition. In the millennium to
come not only will Satan be bound but, even better, Christ will reign and the
Law of God will prevail. God has given mankind His law before, but man has never
kept to it so he has never seen the benefits of it; never reaped the rewards!
Consequently man tires easily and not understanding that “the law of the Lord
is perfect” (Psalm 19:7), as mentioned in our last issue of “Covenant Voice” with reference to the planets,
substitutes his own ideas, with disastrous
consequences
In
the garden, Adam conversed with God and could have learned to love good but
through Eve’s sin of disobedience he chose instead to listen to Satan. Since
when, for the past six millennia mankind has had to learn instead to hate evil.
As
God was with Adam in Eden so Christ will be with mankind during His millennium
reign. But since Adam, Christ came and paid the penalty for man’s sin and in ‘His Millennium’ there will be no serpent; and those who have witnessed to the word of God, “lived
and reigned with Christ a
thousand years”, (Revelation 20:4).
This Millennium is part of God’s plan for bringing together and fulfilling those
things promised which are yet to be and preparing the people of all the nations
for a righteous judgement, both the believer and the unbeliever. For it is not
until the end of the thousand year period that
scripture tells us of the casting of the devil into the lake of fire and the
second resurrection. “ …. and the books were opened: and another book was
opened, which is the book of life….and they were judged every man according to
their works” (Revelation 20: 12-13).
Here
we see the Book of
Life, described earlier as, “… the
book of life of the Lamb ….” (Revelation 13: 8) so we know that those whose
names appear in it are those who belong to the Lamb of God, (John 1:29) or
Christ, which assures their place in the Kingdom of God. While the other books,
the Books of Works, record their doings
by which they are judged, or assessed, for their function in the Kingdom. And we
see here the operation of the doctrine of Justification by Faith Alone, faith
being all that is required, followed by the Sanctification or works after faith
which follow.
Before
that there will be the
Millennium, the One
Thousand Year Reign, which Jesus Himself likened to the time of Noah when
those not understanding, not watching, there are so many today who will not
accept the fact of the promised return of Christ, will be taken unawares, “…
so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.” (Matthew 24: 37-39).
The Heavens
Declare …
FOR
A FEW brief moments, on the 11th August 1999, people living across a
great swath-like band of the earth stopped whatever they were doing and gazed
skywards in awe and wonder at the majesty of God, as they observed the last
eclipse of both this century and this millennium.
As
the shadow of the moon sped across the world at 1,500 miles per hour, obscuring
the light of the sun, thus plunging the earth into total or partial darkness for
a brief period of from less than a
minute to just over two minutes, dependant on from where one was viewing the
event, most of us experienced an eerie sense of wonder at the strangeness of
this natural phenomena and, curiously, many applauded when the sun reappeared as
if they were, despite themselves, afraid that it just might not do so.
Some,
perhaps, appreciated for the first time in their lives how dependant we are on
the provision of God for our very existence and how precisely the apparently
random array of planets is in fact placed in the heavens; and ordered for
our well being.
Not
that most actually mentioned God, for
across the world many myths still pervade the reasoning of man where some still
live in fear of the unexplained, while even here at home such is the
indifference amongst our own people who no longer believe in a munificent
Creator, choosing rather to see science, which is but the examination
of the created world and the Creator’s power, as the arbiter of all
things.
That
the timing could be so accurately forecast was taken for granted. There have,
after all, been many eclipses before; and they have all arrived on time. So, to
the second the timing was calculated from Nova Scotia, as day dawned on the
eastern coast of Canada at 10.30 a.m.
British Summer Time (BST) to the Bay of Bengal at 1.29 p.m. BST, as dusk began
to fall, and the shadow of the moon completed its three hour journey across the
earth. Reminding those who have “eyes to see” that in the words of the
psalmist, “The Heavens Declare the glory
of God”. (Psalm 19: 1).
To
which he adds that which is self evident in the beginning, “and the firmament showeth his handiwork.” For it was in
the beginning that God created the heaven and the earth (Genesis 1: 1) as it
was in those earlier times of creation that,
“God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser
light to rule the night….” (Genesis 1: 16). Two lights,
the Sun and the Moon, which together played out this particular drama, this last
spectacular show in the heavens of
God’s handiwork before we pass into a new millennium, and all which that may
hold for us in the wonderful plan of God.
If
we continue to the end of this verse we find, in a very few words, another
instance of God’s handiwork,
indeed in so few that it almost seems like an afterthought, “…he
made the stars also.” And then in the next verse we are told that He set
them in the firmament (heaven) to give light upon the earth and then we find
later in the Word of God that these stars, these lesser planets which fill the
heavens and make up our night sky, are not so insignificant after
all for in Psalm 147: 4 we read, “he telleth the number of stars;
he calleth them all by their names.” We then recall that other
reference to stars when the Lord promised Abraham when He chose him because of
his faith, as His friend, to be the founder of the nation of Israel, “…. I
will multiply thy seed as the stars of heaven….” (Genesis 22:17) and we know
that God knows all their
names too, as He does everyone who
will acknowledge him as their personal Saviour and call him Lord.
We
Know that the heavens and the planets have long held an immense fascination for
mankind, from Abraham’s time; and before. The ancients searched the heavens in
anticipation, that they would foretell future events. Abraham, himself was
something of an astronomer and we know that the Magi,
at the time of the birth of Jesus, told Herod that they had seen His star in the
east, “ and are come to worship him”. (Matthew 2:2).
We
read that when Moses gathered the Israelites together before they crossed over
into Jordan into the land which God had promised them he said, “…ye are this
day as the stars of heaven for multitude” (Deuteronomy 1 :10}. We find that
David when he had appointed his son, Solomon, to become king of Israel and had
arranged for a census of the people that he did not count those under the age of
twenty one, “because the Lord had said he would increase Israel like to the
stars of heaven.” (1 Chronicles 27:23). In
Daniel, we read of the time of the end days when every one that shall be found written in the book, the believers,
“they that turn many to righteousness shall shine as the stars for ever and
ever.” (Daniel 12:3).
Many
must have been the times when our ancestors gazed at the sky, as we do, and
wondered as to the order of it all, and perhaps dreamt the impossible dream that
one day there might be a means of reaching the stars and the planets.
That
event, then future, was destined to take place just thirty years ago when
mankind made that first giant step as
Neil Armstrong, walked on the Moon in 1969. Whilst this could never have been
achieved without expertise of the Lunar spaceship planners and programmers
and the courage and expertise of the astronauts themselves, that they
could ever reach the moon at all depended on one factor over which they had
absolutely no control at all; the certainty
with which they could calculate the exact location of the planets at any
one time; and that depended on the precision with which God has set and ordered
the movements of the planets over the millennia past by which one can predict
the present and, when planning years in advance for a space voyage, the future.
The same means by which we were able to know, in advance, the precise moment of our
Eclipse at any place along its path .
Since
that first visit to the moon the explorations, which commenced in earnest during
the 1930’s when probes discovered that Pluto was ice-bound, have increased in
range and number until the Voyager
space probe launched in the late 1970’s embarked on a twelve year journey to
explore Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune and found worlds that defied
imagination. Bringing to us images of God’s handiwork so magnificent that they
truly declare the glory of God and the
majesty of His power.
The
power which these planets, and in some cases their satellites, unleash and is so
awesome and devastating that life as we know it could not survive, let alone
thrive. Power from God, which mankind on earth despite all these discoveries
arrogantly chooses to defy every day. Yet God, in His provision for us, has
given us in the midst of this turbulence which is there for our benefit, for
without the intense heat caused by the violence of the sun we could not
flourish, a world so little affected by all that goes on around us, so gentle
and so perfect for our peaceful existence, if we would but obey Him and keep His
law as the planets do, despite their volatility.
For
in the words of the psalmist, in the same psalm which speaks of the sun and the
moon and the stars, we read, “the law of the Lord is perfect.” (Psalm 19:7).
Without this perfection none of that which we see in the heavens would be
possible, and we would not be able to predict the future orbits of the planets
nor, least of all, the eclipse which so many have so recently witnessed.
Every
eclipse, and although the next total eclipse which will be observable in the
British Isles will not be for another ninety two years, at 5pm on the 23rd
September 2090 in West Cornwall, there are many others in other parts of the
world before then, the next being in 2001 over Southern Africa, should remind us
that, “The Heavens declare the glory of
God and the firmament showeth His handiwork.”
From the Spring 1998 issue
The Fruitful Seed
It
had been another of those
occasions, one of the many during His ministry, when Jesus speaking to the
multitude spoke about that which most readers will know well; that which we have
come to know as the Parable of The Sower.
“Behold,”
He said, “a sower went forth to sow and when he sowed, some seeds fell by the
wayside,… some fell upon stony
ground, … some fell among thorns; but
other seed fell into good ground and brought
forth fruit, some an hundredfold, some sixtyfold, some thirtyfold. Who hath ears
let him hear.” (Matthew 13:3-9).
The
meaning to us is plain. We understand
that this seed is the Word of God. We
know about the seed by the wayside, where those who hear about the word but do not
understand it, find that Satan comes along and takes it away from them before
they have a chance of accepting it. We know too about the stony ground, when some who receive the Good News initially with
joy, but developing little depth to their understanding
reject it in times of difficulties. We also know about the thorns,
and how they choke and strangle the Word with the cares of this world; and we
know too of the Good Seed which
flourishes and bears fruit. We know
because, unlike those who were hearing it for the first time, we have the
explanation in the verses following and
we have the benefit of the witness of those who have expounded the scriptures
down through the centuries. We are heirs to their work and faithfulness.
It
is clear, however, that many who heard on that
day did not have the ears to hear, or
the understanding to understand, and when the disciples were with Jesus later
during those times when He discussed with them the day’s events, which
scripture tells us He frequently did in private following His preaching to the
multitudes, even they asked, “Why speakest thou unto them in parables?” His
reply, which is as much to us today as it was to them, “Because it is given to
you to know the mysteries of the kingdom….” reminds us of the great
privilege that we share in knowing something of God’s plan for His people
Israel and the Kingdom of Heaven, for He went on to conclude, “but to them it
is not given.” And with our privilege, as with any privilege, great is our
responsibility.
As
we contemplate, at this time of the year - when we see the rebirth of Springtime and the coming to life and blossoming of that
seed which has lain dead in the ground
these past months - those events which took place in Jerusalem
culminating in the ‘trial’ and, at the behest of the people, the crucifixion of our
Lord and Saviour, Jesus Christ and all that He endured that all
who believe in Him might have eternal life; we do well to remember this parable
of the sower. For it surely points the way to us today in our witnessing and
teaching of the Word. Encouraging us when we might, in these days
of unbelief, perhaps, be inclined to despair just a little, as we see the
‘faith once delivered to the saints’ denigrated by many through their
ignorance and undermined by others, who should be upholding it and proclaiming
it.
This
parable fixes in the minds of those of us in these days, who have ears to hear, the difficulties which even our Lord encountered when
reasoning with some people. Should we therefore expect to find it any different?
Any easier? Even He, we find, spoke to people whom He knew
would not understand, about the Kingdom of God. “Therefore I speak to them in
parables, because they seeing see not; and hearing hear not, neither do they
understand. And in them is fulfilled the prophecy of Esaias… for this
people’s heart is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their
eyes have closed….” (verses 13-15). Note, they have
closed. How like today!
Yet,
with His foreknowledge
of their spiritual blindness He spoke to them, when He did not need to do
so, in such a way that those who would
hear and would understand might not remain in ignorance, but might hear and
see, “Blessed are your eyes,” He tells the disciples, “for they see: and
your ears, for they hear.” (verse 16).
They
came to understand then, as we do now, that the seed to which Jesus referred in this
parable is the seed of the Word of God, just as they already
knew what He meant when He said to the Pharisees on
another occasion, when castigating them for their unbelief, “I know
that ye are Abraham’s seed.” In response to their attempts to justify
themselves in their misguided belief that all that is required for Salvation is
to be able to claim descent from Abraham.
Today,
it is this other seed which is largely
misunderstood rather than the seed of the Parable of the Sower. This seed of
Abraham which God promised would also be a good
seed, not in the sense of being
good but in the sense of being fruitful,
“That in blessing I will bless thee, in multiplying I will multiply thy seed
as the stars of the heaven, and as the sand which is upon the sea shore…” We
have much explaining, much teaching, to do today to reach out to the Lord’s
people if they are to truly understand the plan of God. For they have, in the
main, lost sight of the vision of
the disciples with regards to the return of Jesus Christ to actually reign as
King of kings. Having understood the meaning of the Parable of the Sower, which
those of Jesus’ time on earth had such difficulty with, many sincere believers
in Jesus Christ as their personal Saviour are
now having equal difficulty in understanding that the Kingdom of God over which
Christ is to rule, is to be here, on earth.
Abraham’s
seed, of which the Northern House of Israel is the larger part, for truly has it
multiplied as the stars of heaven and the sands of the sea shore, in fulfilment
of God’s Covenant with Abraham, is assured a rightful place in the fulfilment
of God’s plan for His people in that day.
The
promise to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob through the blessing of Jacob of his
grandsons Manasseh and Ephraim, of a nation and a Company of nations has long
been fulfilled in Great Britain and her Commonwealth and the United States of
America which all, together with the descendants of the other tribes, forms the Commonwealth of Israel (Ephesians 2:12). And God’s other
promises will follow in due time.
The
seed of Abraham and the seed of the Word of God come together in God’s great
Plan. Where those of Abraham’s seed, who have received that other seed - the
fruitful seed of God’s Word - and believing in Jesus Christ who, “took upon
Himself the seed of Abraham, to make reconciliation for the sins of the
people.” (Hebrews 2:16-17), as their personal Saviour take up their place in
the Kingdom. Together, with any who believe in Christ for, “If ye be
Christ’s then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.”
(Galatians 3:29).
Here,
all in the Kingdom are in the words of Peter, “born again, not of corruptible
seed, but of incorruptible by the Word of God, which liveth and abideth
forever.” (1 Peter 1:23).